For example:. Authors and contributors are often, but not always, identified. If the author is listed, ask yourself—is this person an expert informmation the field?
Does this person work for an organization and, if so, what are the goals of the organization? Is the health information written or reviewed by a healthcare professional? Dependable websites will tell you where their health information came from and how and when it was reviewed. Be careful about testimonials. Personal stories may be helpful and comforting, but not everyone experiences health problems the same way.
Also, there is a big difference between a website, blog, or social media page developed by a single person interested in a topic and a website developed using strong scientific evidence that is, information gathered from research.
No information should replace seeing a doctor or other health professional who can give you advice that caters to your specific situation. Look for websites that stay current with their health information. Often, the bottom of the page will have a date. Pages on the same site may be updated at different times—some may be updated more often than others. Why was the site created? Know the motive or goal of the website so you can better judge its content.
Is the purpose of the site to inform or explain? Or is it trying to sell a product? While cookies may enhance your web experience, they can also compromise your online privacy—so it is important to read how the website will use your information.
Find out why your number is needed, how it web medical information be used, and what will happen if you do not share this information. Only enter your Social Security number on secure websites. Be careful what information you share over social media web medical information.
This can include addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses. Learn how you can keep your information private. Be careful of websites or companies that claim any one remedy will cure a lot of different illnesses.
Question dramatic writing or cures web medical information seem web medical information good to be true. Make sure you can find other websites with the same information. Health apps can help you track your eating habits, physical activity, test results, or other information. But, anyone can develop a health app—for any reason— and apps may include inaccurate or web medical information information.
Make sure you know who made any app you use. The advice offered frequently had little basis in biomedical science or accepted medical practice. Slightly more than one third of messages recommended unconventional interventions for upper extremity pain, such as acupuncture, aromatherapy, Qi Gong, homeopathy, and Jin Shin Jytsu. These findings support our second hypothesis. Typically, a new discussion group member described one or two symptoms and elicited numerous responses about the nature of the problem and how best to manage it.
In this case, the diagnosis, treatment, and attribution to use of the computer appeared to be unverified. I have sore elbows, and the muscles going down my arms become sore.
I cannot lift heavy things and have begun backing off of computer time. I had something very similar. It could be related to thoracic outlet syndrome. In general, contributors appeared to assume that what was stated by other contributors was true, and there was a conspicuous absence of critical evaluation of conclusions drawn.
I shifted a lot of boxes, carried stuff from here to there, put up shelves i. As soon as I got back to work and started typing, I could feel things start to ache again. I guess it was a case of using different muscles, tendons, etc.
They cost a lot of money and they know less about the specifics of your body than a good physical therapist. Doctors simply do not spend enough time with their patients they make too much money to treat us like individuals. Several methodologic problems limit the inferences that can be drawn from our results.
First, we characterized medical advice as conventional or unconventional rather than assessing its efficacy or safety.
These latter features are of web medical information interest, but were impossible to assess owing to the absence of rigorous data regarding most interventions for upper extremity symptoms.
Similarly, we could not evaluate the medical appropriateness of advice given, or assess web medical information and benefits of compliance. Most of the interventions recommended were low in cost and did not include surgery. In some cases more aggressive therapy may have had less risk, such as surgery after a trial of conservative treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome to prevent this web page nerve damage.
The inability to assess the benefit or risk of recommendations is another limitation of the results of this web medical information. A related limitation was our inability to verify the identity and motives of authors, beyond the self-identification they provided. We did identify 41 messages 2. There were so few messages written by persons with professional training that when stratified by source and type of information the categories were too small to provide meaningful information.
Our observations can be understood in at least two contexts: snake oil and self-help. Snake oil is a term applied to medical misinformation, and by extension to medical products with unproven efficacy or unproven safety.The leading source for trustworthy and timely health and medical news and information. Providing credible health information, supportive community. Medicine is the science and practice of caring for a patient, managing the diagnosis, prognosis, prevention, treatment, palliation of their injury or disease, and promoting their health.
Although the term snake oil web medical information willful deception, misinformation and unproven products may be dispensed for many reasons: honest error, a desire to promote a particular web medical information or ideology, or a desire for commercial gain. Snake oil has a long history in health care, ranging from the promotion click questionable nutritional remedies, 21 to unconventional therapies such as electromagnetic fields, 22 and including treatments for arthritis, 23 allergies, 24 cancer, 25 and AIDS.
Internet discussion groups may also be understood within the tradition of self-help groups in health care. Self-help groups, a growing trend in the United States, 2829 vary greatly in style, subject, and format. Common characteristics include a shared concern, self-governance, a democratic ideology, and nonprofit status. The impact of self-help groups on their members is difficult to assess. Few studies have formally evaluated them, and contradictory results have emerged.
Many of the participants reported symptoms that they attributed to using a computer keyboard, so it appeared incongruous that they turned for help to an activity that required more typing. A majority of the information on the forum we studied dealt with medically related subjects. Our observations corroborated previous concerns about accuracy, appropriateness, and sources of information on the Internet.
MedlinePlus - Health Information from the National Library of Medicine
Most of the advice was given by persons without professional training or credentials and was based on personal experience alone. Although the implied costs of the advice we reviewed were generally low, one third of the recommended interventions were unconventional. The causes of upper extremity pain are diverse and incompletely understood.
Conventional treatments vary in effectiveness, so it is not surprising that affected persons turn to an outlet such as the SOREHAND bulletin mdeical for help. However, our observations support the concern that appropriate diagnosis and treatment may elude participants in such electronic bulletin board discussions, on web medical information scale that is unprecedented. J Gen Intern Med. Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer.
Address Correspondence and reprint request to Dr. Copyright by the Society of General Internal Medicine. This article has web medical information cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract OBJECTIVE To assess medical information provided in a medically oriented Internet discussion group, in terms of the professional status of the individuals providing information, the consistency of the information with standard medical practice, and the nature of the evidence cited in support of specific claims or recommendations.
DESIGN Standardized review of 1, consecutive messages on a particular online discussion group during a 5-month period. Keywords: medical information, Inforjation, computer communication networks, quality assurance, alternative medicine, self-help groups.
Table 1 Type of Author. Open in a separate window. Table 2 Message Purpose. Table 3 Message Content. References 1.
Health Information on the Web | FDA
Kassirer JP. The next transformation in the delivery of health care. N Engl J Med. Bull Med Libr Assoc. Nagy K. Glowniak JV. Medical resources on the Internet. Ann Intern Med. Goldwein JW, Benjamin I. Internet-based medical information: time to take charge.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Reynolds TM. Popular medical information on Internet. Sharma P. Spooner SA. On-line resources for pediatricians. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Kassirer JP, Angell M.
The Internet and web medical information Journal. Zeligher J. Internet news: patient handouts from the Internet. MD Comput. Medical information retrieval and WWW browsers at Mayo. Hoke F. Struggle over online cancer service spurs larger medical ethics debate. Keoun B. Cancer patients find quackery on the Web. J Natl Cancer Inst. Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveat lector et viewor —Let the reader and viewer beware.
Upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders of https://canadianpharmacyntv.com/8-drug-prices-comparison-kadej.php origin.
Annu Rev Public Health. Young JH. American Health Quackery. The paradise of quacks. NY State J Med. Dehart OW. Quackery: the modern highwayman.
Find information on health conditions, wellness issues, and more in easy-to-read language on MedlinePlus, the up-to-date, trusted health information site. canadianpharmacyntv.com is a website from the NIH's National Library of Medicine that has dependable consumer information about more than 1, health-related topics.